From - Sat Jan 22 12:50:39 2000
Return-Path: <jzapataarauco@yahoo.com>
Received: from mailserver.Princeton.EDU ([127.0.0.1])
          by imap1.Princeton.EDU (Netscape Messaging Server 3.61)
           with ESMTP id AAA6E1E for <rdnelson>;
          Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:08:22 -0500
Received: from Princeton.EDU (postoffice.Princeton.EDU [128.112.129.120])
	by mailserver.Princeton.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA28163
	for <rdnelson@mail.Princeton.EDU>; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:08:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from web1706.mail.yahoo.com (web1706.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.217])
	by Princeton.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA20405
	for <rdnelson@Princeton.EDU>; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:08:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 28414 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Jan 2000 19:08:15 -0000
Message-ID: <20000118190815.28413.qmail@web1706.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [199.8.199.169] by web1706.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:08:15 PST
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:08:15 -0800 (PST)
From: juan zapata-arauco <jzapataarauco@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Correcting  theoretical assumption for Analyses for 5/11/99 data.
To: rdnelson <rdnelson@Princeton.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii



--- rdnelson <rdnelson@Princeton.EDU> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, juan zapata-arauco wrote:
> 
> > Congratulations for the impressive preliminary Y2K
> > results. I believe that Dean made a sophisticated
> 
> Thanks.  Yes, it is extremely interesting.  Your
> newest
> analyses are also very intriguing and I will have
> time later
> to respond more fully, but wanted now only to let
> you know I have
> received them.
> 
> Roger
> 
> 
I believe that assumptions (3) and (4) that I used for
this analyses are not logically congruent as a
reduction in noise or entropy can not be translated
to a reduction in the number of random events that is
in itself another way of increase noise or entropy.

Both assumptions corrected in this way must be read
instead as one plain assumption;

"(3)that in tone with experimentally observed
reduction
of Anomalous Cognition Effect Sizes under GC
culmination this would be reflected in REGs  as a
reduction in the average of random events recorded
each minute around the minute of this culmination."

With my best regards,

Juan  
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
