From - Sat Jan 22 12:49:51 2000
Return-Path: <jzapataarauco@yahoo.com>
Received: from mailserver.Princeton.EDU ([127.0.0.1])
          by imap1.Princeton.EDU (Netscape Messaging Server 3.61)
           with ESMTP id AAA5B31 for <rdnelson>;
          Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:02:48 -0500
Received: from Princeton.EDU (postoffice.Princeton.EDU [128.112.129.120])
	by mailserver.Princeton.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA23328
	for <rdnelson@mail.Princeton.EDU>; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:02:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from web1701.mail.yahoo.com (web1701.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.212])
	by Princeton.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA25765
	for <rdnelson@princeton.edu>; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:02:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 20960 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Jan 2000 01:02:45 -0000
Message-ID: <20000118010245.20959.qmail@web1701.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [199.8.199.161] by web1701.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:02:45 PST
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:02:45 -0800 (PST)
From: juan zapata-arauco <jzapataarauco@yahoo.com>
Subject: GIF Analyses for selected Events/min at 5/11/99
To: rdnelson@Princeton.EDU
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Dear Roger:

Congratulations for the impressive preliminary Y2K
results. I believe that Dean made a sophisticated
and successful attempt for sorting the noise during
the transition to the new millennium (you may check
that the geomagnetic activity was very intense during
this time).

I followed the steps of Dean (not in detail) for a
superposed epoch analysis around the minute of
culmination of the Galactic Center(GC)in UTC for EGGs
under this condition during the extreme geomagnetic
calm period of May 5,1999. I assumed (1) that the
extraordinary low in geomagnetic fluctuations during
this day could increase any hypothetical "anomalous"
sideral signal affecting the REGs working during the
times of culmination of the GC, (2)that any
global/local consciousness effects during the
intervals around GC culmination(+/-30 min)in this day
were negligible, (3)that in tone with experimentally
observed reduction of Anomalous Cognition Effect Sizes
under GC culmination this would be reflected in
physical systems as a reduction in noise or entropy,
and (4) reduced entropy can be detected as a reduction
in the average of randon events recorded each minute
around the minute of GC culmination.

To search for these reductions, I made the following
preliminary steps:

a)Download all per-minute raw data for EGGs 100,102,
103,107 and 1005  around +/-30 minutes of the times
(minutes) of GC culmination.

b)Calculate the standard deviation across EGGs (SDAE)
for each of these raw values, per minute.

c)Create 5 one-hour blocks of raw values per minute,
each centered on the minute of GC culmination in each
EGG's geographical longitude.

d)Create a superposed epoch analysis by overlaying the
5 blocks of data.

e)Calculate the total standard deviation across the
60 minutes of blocked averaged data across the EGGs,
design these values TSD.

f)Calculate the Variability Range of each average
minute across EGGs in the superposed epoch analysis
dividing each SDAE by the total TSD.These values are
plotted in the figure "Range of Variability of the
Superposed Epoch Analysis(5/11/99)"

g)Make standard normal deviates (z scores) based on
the total average per minute and the observed averaged
across EGGs per minute. These values are plotted in
the figure "Superposed Epoch Analysis(5/11/99)". From
the resulting z-scores, the odds against chance (one
tailed) are not significant and are NOT showed.

NOTE: It is interesting to note that for May 11, 1999
the z scores for one minute before GC culmination are
significant for EGG 102(Z=-3.15, p(one tailed)<0.0008)
and are showed in the two figures named "Random Events
/min(EGG102/5/99)"(z plot and odds against chance
respectively). Similarly for EGG 100 we have for one
minute before GC culmination: Z=-2.09, p(one tailed)
<0.0183 and for EGG 1005 (one minute before GC
culmination): Z=-1.75, p(one tailed)< 0.0401. There
is another significant z-score in the direction
expected and in another minute in the 60 minute
interval used in each case and for this reason the
correspondent figures are not showed.

Please let me know of any questions about these
analyses.

With my best regards,

Juan 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
